One of the things that makes sustaining the arts so difficult is that it is harder to get funding for the back office operations -- that is, general operating support -- than for specific projects. As a result, organizations that should be spending more time building their organizational infrastructure are instead doing the things that bring them attention from funders.
That's why the arts can benefit from a revenue stream that doesn't rely on a private funder's particular interest. In the previous essay on this topic, I talked about how Allegheny County and the state of Colorado generated hundreds of millions of dollars for arts through a sales tax initiative. More interestingly, Allegheny County is able to increase the amount going to the arts because of this revenue model.
I argued that states could develop a funding pool without raising sales taxes. What states or districts can do is to reserve a portion of taxes above a base for the arts. (This is a model known as tax increment financing [TIF], which is used in most of the country to support big development projects.) This money can help support creative placemaking activities that not only benefit the arts, but also make communities more attractive for cultural tourism and businesses that rely on highly educated workers. As the arts improve the quality of place, attracting more shoppers and workers, people spend more money, and more support goes to the arts, and the cycle continues.
This fund can help to support the kinds of activities that are less likely to be supported by private foundations and corporations, including:
- Organizational development and administrative activities that help arts organizations become more effective.
- Place marketing efforts and collaboratives, such as arts councils. While individual organizations may want to support local arts councils and efforts to market their communities, they need to support themselves first. Also, the current funding environment (some win grants, others lose) furthers competition that may make it harder for some organizations to work together.
- Arts events and festivals. Some of the larger arts events generate enormous returns on investments to their communities. The WaterFire event in Providence, Rhode Island, attracts about 1 million visitors and $25 million in private spending per year, according to Tom Borrup in The Creative Community Builders Handbook. But most small festivals need to build their audiences over time to have these kinds of numbers. The TIF can invest in these events and festivals as they build their audiences.
- Public art and street art activities. These can help attract people to commercial areas or encourage shoppers there now to stay longer (which can generate more consumer spending.)
- Interorganizational mergers and partnerships. There are a number of people -- funders and even arts advocates -- who say there are too many distinct arts organizations. The TIF can provide incentives for organizations to engage in long-term partnerships or even merge.
- Arts activities in underserved communities. Some places -- Manhattan in New York City; Santa Fe, New Mexico; and Asheville, North Carolina -- will always get more funding because funders spend more time in these places. The TIF could be a catalyst for arts-based economic and community development in neighborhoods and towns without large and influential arts organizations or strong advocates.